Advisory-embedded model

Economic Impact & Carbon Assessment Toolkit

Quantifies what an energy-efficiency or decarbonisation programme actually returns — energy saved, emissions avoided, fiscal effect and employment — and ranks measures by cost per tonne.

What it looks like

Economic Impact & Carbon Toolkit — abatement curve

Marginal abatement cost — measures ranked by cost per tonne

Energy saved

CO₂ avoided

Fiscal return

Schematic layout — the tool's real structure and outputs, drawn rather than screenshotted so no client data appears. Bars and blocks are placeholders, never figures.

Decision supported

Which measures to fund first, what the programme returns against what it costs, and what can be defended to a finance ministry or a donor board.

Intended user

Ministries, municipalities, donor programmes and institutions with a reporting obligation or an investment case to make.

Inputs

Programme or building-portfolio scope
Capex and opex by measure
Baseline consumption and, where available, metered data
Emission factors and, where relevant, carbon price assumptions
Macroeconomic parameters for multiplier effects

Outputs

Energy savings and CO₂ reduction by measure and in aggregate
Marginal Abatement Cost Curve ranking measures by cost per tonne
Fiscal return and employment effects
KPI scorecard and dashboards structured for reporting

Methodology summary

An integrated model linking capital and operating flows to energy, emissions and macroeconomic outcomes, with each layer separable so a reviewer can interrogate one without unpicking the rest. The same structure underpinned a national energy-efficiency impact assessment delivered for UNDP Kosovo in 2025.

Limitations

Macroeconomic multipliers are parameters, not measurements. They are stated explicitly and varied in sensitivity rather than presented as single-point truth.
Savings estimates are ex-ante. Verified savings require metering after implementation, which is a separate exercise the toolkit is designed to hand over to.
Emission factors depend on the grid mix assumed; in a system decarbonising quickly, the avoided-emissions figure moves with it.

Screenshots

Economic Impact & Carbon Assessment Toolkit — interface rendering showing the executive dashboard with a demo dataset. — Interface rendering — the tool's real screens and outputs, produced as a design rather than captured from a running session. Demo dataset throughout: no client name, real place or real figure appears. **Deliberately cropped to the results pane.** The navigation column is not shown: what a tool produces is the useful thing to publish, while its full module structure is method rather than proof. Cropped, not blurred — a blurred screenshot reads as either a mock-up or as something being hidden badly, and both cost more than the architecture is worth.

Access model

Applied within an engagement, with methodology documentation for institutional reuse.

Request a demonstration

Tell us the context, timeline and decision you're working toward.

Request a demonstration

We reply within two business days.